lonely planet singapore city guide

File Name:lonely planet singapore city guide.pdf
Size:1784 KB
Type:PDF, ePub, eBook, fb2, mobi, txt, doc, rtf, djvu
Category:Book
Uploaded20 May 2019, 20:16 PM
InterfaceEnglish
Rating4.6/5 from 815 votes
StatusAVAILABLE
Last checked5 Minutes ago!

lonely planet singapore city guide

It incorporates a numerical and a colour-coding score system to highlight high-risk manual handling tasks. Many handling operations, for example the occasional lifting of a small lightweight object, will involve negligible handling risk. To help identify situations where a more detailed risk assessment is necessary, HSE has developed filters to screen out straightforward cases (see Appendix of L23 ). However, the MAC is not appropriate for all manual handing operations, and may not comprise a full risk assessment. Therefore it is unlikely to be acceptable if relied upon alone. To be 'suitable and sufficient', a risk assessment will normally need to take account of additional information such as individual capabilities, and should conform to the requirements in the MHOR. People with knowledge and experience of the handling operations, industry specific guidance, and specialist advice may also be helpful. Remember to consult and involve employees and safety representatives. To help employers properly assess tasks, HSE has produced a series of tools. They are split by the type of task, but you should bear in mind that for some tasks you may have to consider using more than one tool. It is designed to help you understand, interpret and categorise the level of risk of various known risk factors associated with manual handling activities. You may not need to use the V-MAC as it is more complex than is needed for assessing many manual handling operations. It is best suited for order picking and distribution systems which can automatically generate the data for importing into the V-MAC. It assesses some of the common risk factors in repetitive work that contribute to the development of upper limb disorders. You should involve your employees and safety representatives during the assessment process. Where several people do the same task, make sure you have some insight into the demands of the job from all employees’ perspective. 2.http://www.alphapipes.com/userfiles/image/honda-cb-900-f-supersport-clymer-manual.xml

Select the appropriate type of assessment (ie lifting, carrying or team handling). If a task involves lifting and carrying, consider both. 3. Follow the appropriate assessment guide and flow chart to determine the level of risk for each risk factor.Take note of the risk banding from the graph below and enter the colour band and numerical score. If the colour band is purple, the task should be examined very closely, as such operations may represent a serious risk of injury and should come under close scrutiny, particularly when the entire weight of the load is supported by one person.Use the following image to guide your assessment: Use the following illustrations as a guide: If the torso twists in relation to the hips and thighs or the operative leans to one side as the load is lifted, the colour band is amber and the numerical score is 1. If the torso both twists and bends to the side as the load is lifted the colour band is red and the numerical score is 2. If one of the risk factors is present score 1, if two or more of the risk factors are present score 2. Take note of the risk banding from the graph below and enter the colour band and numerical score. If the colour band is purple, the task should be examined very closely, as such operations may represent a serious risk of injury and should come under close scrutiny, particularly when the entire weight of the load is supported by one person. Use the following image to guide your assessment: The following illustrations should guide your assessment. If one of the risk factors is present score 1, if two or more of the risk factors are present score 2. Enter the colour band and numerical score below If the colour band is purple the task should be examined very closely. Such operations may represent a serious risk of injury and should come under close scrutiny, particularly when the entire weight of the load is supported by the team.http://dawahcity.com/userfiles/honda-cb-1100-manual.xml

Use the following illustrations to guide your assessment: Use the following illustrations as a guide: If the torso twists in relation to the hips and thighs or the operatives lean to one side as the load is lifted, the colour band is amber and the numerical score is 1. If the torso both twists and bends to the side as the load is lifted the colour band is red and the numerical score is 2. If one of the risk factors is present score 1, if two or more of the risk factors are present score 2. Look to see if the team have control of the load, that it is lifted smoothly, and that all members lift together. An unco-ordinated team lift may leave one member of the team bearing the entire weight. It is not intended toYou should also seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of such checklist is. Featuring a numerical and colour-coded scoring system, you can easily interpret the risk involved in any particular task. However, if you’re a new or existing CRAMS customer you’ll experience the MAC Tool in a completely different way. Our procedural tool also provides guidance on the safest practices to follow, helping minimise the risk of injury occurring in your workplace. Manual handling tasks and acknowledgements are logged to ensure compliance. CRAMS also features a library of Safety Data Sheets which import relevant data into your documents, allowing access to the originals when necessary. Information on how we use cookies can be found in our privacy policy. MAC is a tool developed to help users identify high risk workplace manual handling activities. MAC has a numerical and colour coding score system to highlight high-risk manual handling tasks. Go to for help. These cookies don't collect information that identifies a visitor and are all anonymous. They are used to measure its performance and to provide enhancements to you while using the site.It will also benefit those already involvedWe do not recommend using a. What is the distance the load has to be moved.

How often does the load have to be moved. Is there pushing, pulling or precise positioning of the load, sudden movement, inadequate rest or recovery periods, team handling or seated work? Anyone with a known injury or disability should be individually assessed. Does the individual require unusual strength or height for the activity, are they pregnant, disabled or suffering from a health problem. Is specialist knowledge or training required? Otherwise, it is necessary to assess the level of risk and to identify any steps required to reduce the risk so far as is reasonably practicable. To do this, the HSE propose two levels of risk assessment. You can connect on Linkedin with our Director Gareth Milner (who has written these assessments) on this link. It incorporates a numerical and a colour-coding score system to highlight high risk manual handling tasks. It is appropriate for assessing loads above 8kg. Lifting from Dolav - MAC Tool Lowering to Pallet - MAC Tool indg383.pdf The flow charts provide an overview of the risk factors and assessment process, while the assessment guides provide information to help you determine the level of risk for each factor. RAPP Tool Assessment 1. It assists you in assessing some of the common risk factors in repetitive work that contribute to the development of Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs). Repetitive Task - Pie Factory Repetitive Task - Packaging Factory A single page score sheet is used to evaluate body posture, forceful exertions, type of movement or action, repetition, and coupling. Using the REBA score sheet, the assessor will assign a score for each of the following body regions: wrists, forearms, elbows, shoulders, neck, trunk, back, legs and knees. After the data for each region is collected and scored, tables on the form are then used to compile the risk factor variables, generating a single score that represents the level of MSD risk.

REBA Tool Assessment 1 REBA Tool Assessment 2 Work through the three sections of the appropriate checklist. You may also find it helpful to include diagrams or photographs to illustrate the tasks. It may also help to write down the names of those you need to consult about implementing the remedial steps. Some tasks may involve more than one operator, each with a different level of risk, depending on what they do. Either note the differences on one checklist or use a separate one for each operator. Return to the end of Section A and decided whether the overall risk of injury is Low, Medium or High. This will help prioritise remedial action if you have a large number of risk assessments to carry out. Ring the appropriate word at the bottom of Section A after you have completed Section B. Record the assessor’s name, the name of the person responsible for carrying out any remedial action and the date which it should be completed. Only complete the final column once this action has been taken. It may also be useful to enter the target date for reassessment if appropriate. When all the manual handling tasks have been assessed, the completed checklists can be compared to help prioritise the most urgent actions. However, there are likely to be several ways to reduce the risks identified and some will be more effective than others. Do not delay action on those that can be implemented easily and quickly simply because they may be less effective than others. Check at a later date to make sure that the remedial action to remove or reduce the risk of injury has been effective. The checklists will help bring out a range of ideas on how the risks identified can be avoided or reduced by making modifications to the load, the task and the working environment. Remember a solution should primarily be sought to completely remove the handling risk where possible.

The steps taken to reduce the risk of MSDs should be appropriate and address the problem in a realistic, practical and effective way. After implementing any changes that reduce the level of risk, returning to the task at a later date and completing another assessment will help to see if your solution has been successful in reducing MSD risk. Discuss the changes with the handlers, or regularly check accident and ill health data and their causes. If the changes do not have the desired result, reassess the situation. The assessment should be kept up to date and reviewed if new information. It is best suited for order picking and distribution systems which can automatically generate the data for importing into the V-MAC. You are viewing premium content from Croner-i. Call 0800 231 5199 to learn more. The V-MAC is designed to be used in conjunction with HSE’s existing Manual Handling Assessment Charts (MAC) tool, which uses a numerical and colour-coding score system to identify high-risk lifting, carrying and team handling activities, and to evaluate possible ergonomic improvements. However, while the MAC tool is designed for assessing handling tasks where the same weight is handled over a work shift, the V-MAC is for assessing jobs where the load weights vary — such as certain order picking, parcel sorting, and trailer loading and unloading work. In addition, because it can be difficult and time consuming to obtain the weights of each item a person handles during a work shift, the V-MAC is best suited for use alongside order picking and distribution systems which can automatically generate the items’ weight data for importing into the V-MAC Excel worksheets. Google Webmaster ToolsIf this is the first time you are notifying Google about this Sitemap, please add it via so you can track its status. Please note that we do not add all submitted URLs to our index, and we cannot make any predictions or guarantees about when or if they will appear.

Ihre Anforderung befindet sich bereits in der Warteschlange. Bitte versuchen Sie es spater nochmal. It is important to remember that: there is a lot you can do to prevent them; preventative measures are often simple and cost-effective; you cannot prevent all MSDs, but where they occur, early reporting of symptoms, proper treatment and suitable rehabilitation are Manual handling assessment charts (MAC) is a tool aimed at employers, health and safety managers and safety representatives and is used by health and safety inspectors. The tool will help individuals to assess the most common risk factors in lifting (and lowering), carrying and team handling operations and was developed to identify high-risk Manual does the law say. You may need to do a full risk assessment when certain conditions It is important to remember that: there is a lot you can do to prevent them; preventative measures are often simple and cost-effective; you cannot prevent all MSDs, but where they occur, early reporting of symptoms, proper treatment and suitable rehabilitation are Manual handling assessment charts (MAC) is a tool aimed at employers, health and safety managers and safety representatives and is used by health and safety inspectors. The tool will help individuals to assess the most common risk factors in lifting (and lowering), carrying and team handling operations and was developed to identify high-risk Manual does the law say? 2 The Manual handling Operations Regulations 1992 set out a clear hierarchy of measures for dealing with risk likely to cause harm from Manual handling. These are: avoid hazardous Manual handling operations so far as reasonably practicable; assess any Manual handling operations that cannot be avoided; reduce the risk of injury to as low as reasonably practicable. Structure of the MAC There are three types of assessment that can be carried out with the MAC: lifting operations (pages 3 6); carrying operations (pages 7 10); team handling operations (pages 11 13).

For each type of assessment there is an assessment guide and a flow chart. Always consider individual and psychosocial issues when completing the MAC: Score sheet. Spend some time observing the task (videoing may help) to ensure that what you are seeing is representative of normal working procedures. You should involve your employees and safety representatives during the assessment process. Where several people do the same task, make sure you have some insight into the demands of the job from all employees perspective. Select the appropriate type of assessment (ie lifting, carrying or team handling ). 5 If a task involves lifting and carrying, consider both. Follow the appropriate assessment guide and flow chart to determine the level of risk for each risk factor. Information on risk reduction can be found on the HSE website at and in the HSE publication Manual handling at work (see Further reading ). Enter the colour band and corresponding numerical score on the MAC: Score sheet. The colour bands help determine which elements of the task require attention. Enter the remaining task information and use the scores to help identify which risk factors need to be examined and the total level of exposure to risk. Take note of the risk banding from the graph below and enter the colour band and numerical score onto the MAC: Score sheet. If the colour band is purple, the task should be examined very closely, as such operations may represent a serious risk of injury and should come under close scrutiny, particularly when the entire weight of the load is supported by one person. 7 Note: High frequency handling operations of light weights will fall within the green zone, but may be associated with upper limb problems. Please refer to Upper limb disorders in the workplace and assessment of Repetitive Tasks of the upper limbs (the ART tool) (see Further reading ) for advice on further assessment.

Use the following to guide your assessment: C Vertical lift region Observe the position of the operative s hands at the start of the lift and as the lift progresses. Always assess the worst case scenario. Use the following illustrations as a guide: D Torso twisting and sideways bending Observe the operative s torso as the load is lifted. F Grip on the loadG Floor surface H Other environmental factors Observe the work environment and score if the lifting operation takes place: in extremes of temperature; with strong air movements; or in extreme lighting conditions (too dark or bright).Companies might regard some of the examples as normal practice. The principles behind HSEs land use planning methodology Pure Cultures. Fanny Hesse ’s invention that changed microbiology forever. Jay Hardy, MT, SM (ASCP) CEO of Hardy Diagnostics. If no expression is given, all packets on the net will be dumped.However, based on a desire to protect genetically unique birds, Europe and Singapore granted permission for an. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Please try again.Please try again.Please try again. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. Videos Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video. Upload video To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Manual handling assessment tools from HSE Lifting, carrying and team manual handling activities involve risks, a significant one being physical injury to the operative.

To help employers and staff to properly assess tasks the HSE has developed a series of information, training and decision-support tools. One of these, the MAC tool, has been developed to help people in a workplace to identify high risk manual handling activities. The MAC tool is designed to help people to understand, interpret, categorise and reduce the level of risk associated with manual handling activities. The MAC is essentially a flowchart that helps to highlight high risk manual handling tasks through a numerical and a colour-coded score system. General information is provided on the risks associated with manual handling and the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (MHOR-1992) which outlines the employers duties. Where can you find the MAC tool. You can download a copy of the HSE MAC Document as a PDF here. You can also find valuable information in the Musculoskeletal section of the HSE website. For specific advice and training about manual handling just contact Acorn by phone or by email. Content copyright Acorn Health and Safety 2017 onwards. The V-MAC (Variable Manual Handling Assessment Chart) is to be be used in conjunction with the MAC tool (Manual Handling Assessment Charts Tool) and was developed for jobs such as order picking, parcel sorting and trailer loading where the weights being handled are variable. The V-MAC is an additional graph which, when used alongside the MAC, provides accurate risk analysis. Use of the tools HSE states that simple handling operations may not require the V-MAC tool, recommending its use in tandem with more complex systems from which it can automatically import data. The V-MAC tool also requires training in order to operate it. This however can be acquired through the support pages of the HSE website. Background information on the development of the V-MAC tool is also available in research reports RR838 and RR1003 on the HSE website.

Sources: V-MAC Tool Our EHS experts are at your disposal and will be happy to answer your questions. We invite you to subscribe to our newsletter. It incorporates a numerical and a colour-coding score system to highlight high-risk manual handling tasks. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Read our Cookie Notice. Our library is the biggest of these that have literally hundreds of thousands of different products represented. I get my most wanted eBook Many thanks If there is a survey it only takes 5 minutes, try any survey which works for you. You can find out about our cookies and how to disable cookies in our Privacy Policy. If you continue to use this website without disabling cookies, we will assume you are happy to receive them. Close. They are now used within the workplace to help identify manual handling activities that could pose a high level of risk.At each step, the user is able to evaluate and apportion a grade to the degree of risk. An assessment guide then helps with the scoring of each task.Find out how you can be part of Designing Buildings Wiki.Book review. By continuing to use this site, you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. For more information, please see our Cookies Policy. We have developed an innovative approach to HSE consultancy services that could be of major benefit to your organisation. All images and content are copyrighted and can not be used, replicated or reproduced without written permission. 2017. It includes new illustrations, new team handling categories and weight limits, a more comprehensive score sheet, screening questions to check which assessment you should do, and space to list your control measures. Several changes have been made to the scoresheet, but the main text has not been changed. This includes providing a safe place of work, safe systems of work, and information and training.

Regulations also require that PPE should be suitable for the task, adequately maintained and correctly worn. Find out more on the Equality and Human Rights Commission website. This document outlines how a positive management approach can enable managers and employees to minimise the risks from upper limb disorders. The HSE suggest a seven-stage approach to preventing and managing ULDs in the workplace. However, in some instances people can overload their musculoskeletal system at work, without any symptoms being evident in the early stages. This could be from sitting for too long or from doing what might traditionally be thought of as heavy jobs. Therefore, its important to carry out risk assessments across the work site and to identify any possible musculoskeletal hazards to which the workforce is being exposed to prevent any cases occurring. Various risk assessment tools are outlined below, including some on the HSE website. The assessment risk filter and risk assessment worksheets in HSG60 are available free on the HSE website. It helps you assess some of the common risk factors in repetitive work that contribute to the development of ULDs. These give basic guidance and highlight other sources of information. The tool and other information are located at the link above. The HSE states: Using the MAC will help with the initial screening of possible high risk manual handling activities within the workplace. However, the MAC is NOT appropriate for all manual handing operations, and does NOT comprise a full risk assessment. Therefore it is unlikely to be acceptable if relied upon alone. To be suitable and sufficient, a risk assessment will normally need to take account of additional information such as individual capabilities (factors), and should conform to the requirements in the MHOR 1992. The link above will take you to the QEC and support materials.

Tool For Handling How To Use It The link above will take you to the Cornell University REBA worksheet and a presentation explaining how to use it. Industry-specific leaflets on vibration are available from the HSE. You can find out if this is the case in your work site by carrying out a survey on. This encourages employees to note body parts that are causing them pains, aches or discomfort. However, these risk assessment tools are mainly intended for occupational health professionals as they are not all that straight forward to apply for a busy employer. Thus this page is for Dutch employers who are in need of information on manual handling legislations in the Netherlands, and who wants the (relatively) quick version. You see, in the Netherlands a certain amount of freedom in the policy field of occupational safety and health is granted the employers, who jointly with the employees (or their representatives, e.g. trade unions) must reach an agreement on safety and health working conditions ( reference ). And when they have chosen their solution (and implemented it), they will thus automatically have followed the rules of the law which are embedded in that solution. These legislations are largely based on EU Directives thus making sure that the Netherlands also follow the working condition rules as set by EU. If the company has less than 25 employees, this position may be occupied by the director.They enforce the rules by paying companies visits to see if they are properly complying with the rules. They are also the one supervising the Arbo Catalogue ( reference ). At the request of the Dutch government in 2014, a team of OSH professionals and experts in manual handling and low back pain published a guideline for occupational health professionals with the aim of reducing the risk and occurrence of low back pain.

But with the MAC tool you go can go a bit broader in types of manual handling operations as there are also risk assessment models for carrying and team handling operations. If more than 3 kg go to step 2. If more than 25 kg, go directly to step 3. If a risk is detected then go to step three. Either introduce lifting devices or use the NIOSH Lifting Equation or MAC tool to help with optimizing on parameters that make the lifting healthier and safer, e.g. such as reducing the vertical and horizontal lifting distance, the load mass, the lifting frequency etc. If low back pain is already a problem, and you want to find out whether or not it may be work-related, you can use the assessment sheet found in this document: Criteria for determining the work-relatedness of nonspecific low back pain from the Coronel Institute of Occupational Health. That document is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence 4.0. This notice applies to the illustration for the HSE publication, Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool). However, we cannot guarantee the correctness of any information (regulations change from time to time, responsibilities change hands, etc.). Thus we cannot accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information provided here. It therefore includes lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, carrying and holding. The most common injuries that occur as a result of manual handling are strains, sprains and slipped discs, i.e. musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). For example, a sack of potatoes weighing 25kg may be lifted safely by an individual who is properly trained and physically fit. By contrast, however, we have all heard of people who injured their back by lifting light weights such as a file in the office. Such prudent measures as manual handling training (which must be appropriate to the type of work) should be used.

It is especially important to record the training and to provide refresher training at appropriate intervals. The level of detail of the manual handling risk assessment and control measures implemented will depend on the complexity of the task. A more thorough approach will look at all the manual handling hazards, taking into account the nature of the task, the physical capabilities of individuals involved in the task, the size and shape of the load, and the environment in which the lifting operation is being performed. These form the mnemonic TILE. This is usually because the typical models aren’t appropriate and it really is a specialist subject. It is a tool designed to help health and safety officers assess the most common risk factors in lifting (and lowering), carrying and team handling operations. For each type of assessment there is an assessment guide and a flow chart. With a bit of practise they are extremely effective; once you have done the assessment you will then be in a stronger position to justify control measures.